Not quite so shy!

You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Not quite so shy. Not quite so shy.Not quite so shy.

As we all know, people have personalities. The personality of a person influences the way he or she interacts with other people. Animals also differ in the way they interact with other animals. As people who have pets might recognize, some pets are shy, others are bold. Scientists are increasingly aware of the fact that also animals differ in their personality. However, it remains difficult to quantify the personality of an animal. In the great tit (Parus major), scientists have devised methods to assess the personality of an animal. This provides insight into how animals with different personalities cope with certain situations. But how do you measure the personality of a bird?

IMG_4938

In great tits, personality is measured as exploration score. This means that birds that quickly explore new unfamiliar surroundings have a different personality than birds that do not explore quickly. This is measured this by introducing a bird to a chamber which contains 5 artificial trees (for pictures look here). During the first 2 minutes in this unfamiliar room all movements are tracked and used as a proxy for their personality. Birds with a low score did not move much and are generally seen as shy individuals. Birds with high scores moved a lot and visited all the artificial trees, they are seen as bold individuals and tend to be more aggressive towards other great tits.

The personality scores from the laboratory are nice, but what does this mean for the interaction between different males in the field? We looked at males because they are the ones defending the territory. We wanted to see whether there is a relation between the differences in personality that are measured in the lab and the way they interact with other males in the field. To do this, we first measured the personality score in many birds in the lab. We released these birds again in the field. During the spring of 2008 we tested how they responded to an unfamiliar male in their territory. We did this by playing the song of a great tit through a speaker. We scored the response of the bird and related this to its personality. The song of great tits consists of several notes (number 3 in the figure below), which are repeated in a strophe (1). Every bird is able to sing several different songs (A, B, C). We expected that shy birds would stay further away from the speaker and respond by singing while bold birds would come close for an all-out brawl to physically remove that other bird from their territory. What we found was unexpected.

LiedjesKoolmezenContrary to what we expected, we found that shy birds came closer to the speaker than bold birds. Bold birds on the other hand stayed further away but responded by singing a different song than before (switching from songtype A to B). This indicated that shy birds responded more aggressively than bold birds. Previous research however found the opposite, there they found that bold birds responded more aggressively by moving in close while shy birds responded by singing from a distance. What could explain these different findings? We noted that the song we used to induce a response was different than what was used in previous research. In short, the song used in the previous research is likely seen as more aggressive by great tits. The reason to respond can differ depending on what you are responding to. Just imagine the following scenario. A small kid calls you a name, you do not really respond because it’s just a kid. If somebody of your own age and size calls you a name you are more likely insulted and will respond aggressively. But if we go even further and a much bigger muscular person calls you a name you might again not respond because you are afraid. So the way you respond to a small kid and a big muscular guy might be the same, but the reason why is very different. So when the signal is weak you do not respond much, with a stronger signal you respond more but with a too strong signal you do not respond again (see figure a below). When we then assume that for each personality this relation between the signal and response is different, then these opposite results start to make sense. When we measure the relation between personality and response with a weak signal, we find slow / shy individuals to respond strongly. Which makes sense, because for a fast / bold individual this weak signal is just not that interesting (the little kid), where for a slow / shy individual this same signal represents the guy of your own size. To the contrary, when we measure the same relation with a strong signal, slow / shy birds are intimidated (as with the big muscular guy) while the fast / bold individuals see that signal as the guy of their own size and respond strongly (figure b below).

BoldShySo there is a clear relation between the personality of a bird and the way it responds to other birds. However, much remains unknown. Although we propose that there might be a relation between the signal and personality, this relation remains untested. To truly understand the way birds communicate, we really need to understand how their personality influences their behavior towards other individuals.

 

Jacobs CGC, van Overveld T, Careau V, Matthysen E, Adriaensen F, Slabbekoorn H:

Personality dependent response to field playback in great tits: slow explorers can be strong responders. Animal Behaviour 2014, 90(0):65-71.

 

March 16, 2014March 10, 201704In UncategorizedTags , , ,

About author

Chris Jacobs (Chris Jacobs)

Evolutionary biologist, eco-evo-devo | seek to increase the understanding of science | PostDoc @ Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology.

More posts

Is the Venezuelan Poodle Moth as soft and cuddly as it looks?

Is the Venezuelan Poodle Moth as soft and cuddly as it looks?

The success of insects and my research on their success.

Are “Sea Bunnies” really cute?

Are “Sea Bunnies” really cute?

Jumping gene turns snake white(r)

Jumping gene turns snake white(r)

Learn about evolution in ‘Evolution Today’

Learn about evolution in ‘Evolution Today’

This house is crap

This house is crap

Big Momma – a video experiment

Big Momma – a video experiment

Comments (4)

  1. Replyon Jul 03, 2014, 3:43 pm

    Sam Hardman

    This is really interesting research. I did my masters on personality in grey seals just last year and I now work on great tits too and am also doing playback experiments. It’s a small world!

    I’m currently working on the effects of urban noise on great tit song for my PhD but I am very keen introduce a personality angle to my research. In fact, my newest results are suggesting personalities to me so hopefully I will be able to do more work in this area very soon.

    • Replyon Jul 04, 2014, 10:06 am

      Chris

      Thanks! Where and with who are you doing your PhD? Personalities are cool to work with but can be pretty difficult. Especially when performing playback experiments there are many aspects to take into account. If I had the time I would test the effect of stimulus strength on personality related response. Unfortunately I do not have the time for that now.. Maybe in the future.

      Would be really cool if someone were to make software which can perform interactive playback automatically. Like play back a song immediately when the focal animal sings, or wait for the focal bird to stop and then play back a song. But I guess that would require quite a bit of programming.

  2. Replyon Jul 05, 2014, 10:29 pm

    Sam Hardman

    I’m currently working at Aberystwyth University in Wales with Rupert Marshall as my supervisor. It’s interesting that you mention looking at the effect of stimulus strength on personality because my experiments this year were using differently degraded songs which are different strengths. Surprisingly I didn’t actually find much difference in responses to the different songs (they might not have been different enough) but I am seeing interesting differences in the behaviour of urban and rural birds which I think could possibly be linked to personality. Essentially I’m finding that urban birds maintain a constant level of response to playbacks over the breeding season, while rural birds start out responding slowly at the beginning of the season but are much quicker than urban birds at the end. I’m still working on this but it’s an interesting pattern!

    I like your idea about automated software. That would be very cool and make things so much easier!

    • Replyon Jul 08, 2014, 8:17 am

      Chris Jacobs

      Sounds very interesting! Good luck with your experiments and I will probably see your papers coming out.

      Cheers, Chris

Leave a Reply

Support Science Explained!

Make a Donation

Subscribe to Science Explained via Email

Email Address

Follow Science Explained on Facebook

Follow Science Explained on Facebook

Follow Science Explained on Google+

Most recent Tweets:

RSS

Science Explained © 2017 | All Rights ReservedThis site uses cookies. Find out more about this site’s cookies. ☒ */ ]]> */]]> */]]> */]]> */]]> */]]> */]]> */]]>

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *